The discussion is very interesting and is available here.
Honest and open . . . refreshing for a debate on eschatology. Each party respects the others views and each representative admits the weaknesses inherent in their own view. The best speaker/debater on the panel by far is Doug Wilson, the representative of Postmillenialism, but everyone else holds their own as well.

In addition to reviewing eschatology books and materials, I will also attempt to define each position in layman's terms to provide a clearer understanding of what each viewpoint holds to. As good as the Evening at Eschatology is as a launching pad into this subject, I came away with less clarity on each point of view rather than more clarity.
What are your thoughts on the debate? What about eschatology in general? Which category would you place yourself in?
No comments:
Post a Comment